In recent cultural flashpoints, such as the controversy surrounding Sydney Sweeney and the American Eagle ad campaign what might look like a mere marketing misstep is in fact symptomatic of a deeper and more insidious phenomenon: the way segments of the conservative movement marshal culture as a permission structure for white supremacist values, undermining the multicultural coalition that democracy depends on.
At its core, conservative cultural posture often presents itself as a defense of "tradition,” “heritage,” or “common values.” But beneath this veneer is a politics of exclusion: a framing that normalizes white identity as default, implicitly elevates racial hierarchies, and uses cultural tropes to provide cover for authoritarian impulses. Sociological research shows that white-male status anxiety is increasingly driving right-wing movements that treat democracy not as a shared civic project, but as a game to be rigged in favor of one group.
Such conservatism doesn’t just passively allow white supremacist ideas, it invites them. According to the Center for American Progress, white supremacist ideas have been repackaged and smuggled into mainstream dialogue via cultural signifiers, dog whistles and strategic ambiguity. In the Sweeney ad example, the “great genes” tagline struck many observers as coded language aligning with eugenic themes of genetic superiority—a cultural wink at supremacist tropes that too often remain unchallenged.
The multicultural progressives, those who believe in pluralism, racial equality, and inclusion must stand up to these threats. Culture wars become permission structures: they legitimize policies and rhetoric that erode civil rights, weaponize identity, and centralize power under the guise of preserving “our way of life.” Scholars point out that authoritarian politics and white supremacy are often two sides of the same coin: one cannot flourish without the other.
The embrace of authoritarianism in the conservative fold is no minor tangent; it is the shadow cast by cultural conservatism when wielded as political strategy rather than philosophical stance. From white supremacist friendly voter suppression laws to the cultural valorizations of “strongmen” leadership, the democratic ideal of citizen equality gives way to stratification and exclusion.
Conservative use of culture as a mere aesthetic or symbolic battleground is far more dangerous than it appears. It is the gateway through which supremacist values infiltrate mainstream acceptance, through which authoritarianism is normalized, and through which the fragile alliance of a multicultural democracy is undermined. If we allow cultural signposts to become permission slips for hierarchy and exclusion, we endanger the very project of democracy itself.
Comments
Post a Comment